The Federal and State EPAs are now putting forth regulations to make oil and gas companies more environmentally responsible. Ohio also has a bill on the table proposing a tax on the producers coming in to Ohio so that a portion of their profits will be (hopefully) used to maintain and improve the infrastructure needed to support this industry.
The Ohio EPA plan has support from the Sierra Club, but not some other fringe environmental groups. That is a good sign that it is somewhat fair. Now - let's hope all these jobs created in Ohio by this industry materialize ASAP!
EPA moves to rein in ‘fracking’ pollution
Midwestern viewpoints without pretentiousness, conformity, regularity or predictability. Hope you enjoy my work!
Halcyon Days - Walt Whitman
Not from successful love alone,
Nor wealth, nor honor'd middle age, nor victories of politics or war;
But as life wanes, and all the turbulent passions calm,
As gorgeous, vapory, silent hues cover the evening sky,
As softness, fulness, rest, suffuse the frame, like freshier, balmier air,
As the days take on a mellower light, and the apple at last hangs
really finish'd and indolent-ripe on the tree,
Then for the teeming quietest, happiest days of all!
The brooding and blissful halcyon days!
Nor wealth, nor honor'd middle age, nor victories of politics or war;
But as life wanes, and all the turbulent passions calm,
As gorgeous, vapory, silent hues cover the evening sky,
As softness, fulness, rest, suffuse the frame, like freshier, balmier air,
As the days take on a mellower light, and the apple at last hangs
really finish'd and indolent-ripe on the tree,
Then for the teeming quietest, happiest days of all!
The brooding and blissful halcyon days!
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
New players staking claims to Ohio’s Utica shale land - Local - Ohio
This is an exciting industry in Ohio right now. Ohio's energy resources have been thought dead for a long time, but technology has caught up now and some of these new wells are able to yield significant natural gas and oil for the first time in decades.
This area of industry fits in well with my practice area, I have one local oil and gas company as a client and hope to get more out of state business that need quality land related legal work. I have a team of professional prepared to offer title opinions, lease and royalty research, contracts and other industry related local representation.
New players staking claims to Ohio’s Utica shale land - Local - Ohio
This area of industry fits in well with my practice area, I have one local oil and gas company as a client and hope to get more out of state business that need quality land related legal work. I have a team of professional prepared to offer title opinions, lease and royalty research, contracts and other industry related local representation.
New players staking claims to Ohio’s Utica shale land - Local - Ohio
Labels:
economy,
fracking,
gas,
lawyer,
legal,
Ohio,
oil,
oil and gas,
real estate,
science,
shale,
work
Friday, March 23, 2012
Ohio foreclosure statistics
Reprinted article from The Ohio Supreme Court regarding foreclosure filings for 2011. I wouldn't read too much into this, this is still a lot of foreclosures and there are a lot, lot more to come in my opinion. Best thing that can happen to really make this trend change is for economy to continue to improve.
March 14, 2012
After experiencing a drop in the number of Ohio foreclosure case filings for the first time in 15 years in 2010, that number declined even further in 2011 by 16 percent, according to data released today by the Supreme Court of Ohio.
For 2011, common pleas courts across Ohio reported 71,556 new residential and commercial foreclosure case filings to the Ohio Supreme Court, or 13,927 fewer foreclosure cases than 2010.
The Ohio Supreme Court began collecting foreclosure data in 1990, and for 14 consecutive years through 2009 the number of foreclosure new filings rose. Not since 2006 have the foreclosure filings been in the range as the numbers recorded for 2011.
Only two counties saw increases in the number of year-over-year foreclosures in 2011. Coshocton County reported 317 foreclosures in 2011 compared with 163 in 2010 for a 94.5 percent increase. Guernsey County reported 198 foreclosures in 2011 compared with 188 in 2010 for a 5.3 percent increase.
On the other end of the spectrum, 75 of Ohio’s 88 counties reported double-digit decreases in 2011, and 10 counties reported 30 percent or greater declines.
Cuyahoga County continued to lead the state in the number of foreclosures with 11,544, although this figure represents a 10 percent annual decline, which followed a 9 percent decline in 2010.
Information contained in the reports is provided to the Ohio Supreme Court on a monthly basis by all county common pleas courts.
By collecting case data, the Ohio Supreme Court attempts to assist in the efficient administration of justice by measuring the pace of incoming litigation for case management purposes. The Ohio Supreme Court does not examine or analyze larger social and governmental trends that may contribute to or influence changes in the number of foreclosure case filings. The foreclosure data submitted by common pleas courts does not break down the number of residential versus
March 14, 2012
Ohio Foreclosure Filings Drop 16 Percent in 2011
After experiencing a drop in the number of Ohio foreclosure case filings for the first time in 15 years in 2010, that number declined even further in 2011 by 16 percent, according to data released today by the Supreme Court of Ohio.For 2011, common pleas courts across Ohio reported 71,556 new residential and commercial foreclosure case filings to the Ohio Supreme Court, or 13,927 fewer foreclosure cases than 2010.
The Ohio Supreme Court began collecting foreclosure data in 1990, and for 14 consecutive years through 2009 the number of foreclosure new filings rose. Not since 2006 have the foreclosure filings been in the range as the numbers recorded for 2011.
Only two counties saw increases in the number of year-over-year foreclosures in 2011. Coshocton County reported 317 foreclosures in 2011 compared with 163 in 2010 for a 94.5 percent increase. Guernsey County reported 198 foreclosures in 2011 compared with 188 in 2010 for a 5.3 percent increase.
On the other end of the spectrum, 75 of Ohio’s 88 counties reported double-digit decreases in 2011, and 10 counties reported 30 percent or greater declines.
Cuyahoga County continued to lead the state in the number of foreclosures with 11,544, although this figure represents a 10 percent annual decline, which followed a 9 percent decline in 2010.
Information contained in the reports is provided to the Ohio Supreme Court on a monthly basis by all county common pleas courts.
By collecting case data, the Ohio Supreme Court attempts to assist in the efficient administration of justice by measuring the pace of incoming litigation for case management purposes. The Ohio Supreme Court does not examine or analyze larger social and governmental trends that may contribute to or influence changes in the number of foreclosure case filings. The foreclosure data submitted by common pleas courts does not break down the number of residential versus
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Foreclosure filings fall sharply in Ohio
Things might be looking up economically. For today, let's pretend that is why foreclosures were down last year and hope that the economy continues to improve in Ohio.
OR WILL IT???
Foreclosure filings fall sharply in Ohio
OR WILL IT???
Foreclosure filings fall sharply in Ohio
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Ohio's Share of Foreclosure Settlement
Jury is still WAAAYYYY OUT on if this settlement will actually help anyone. I have two initial thoughts:
1. The most important part of this is the money that will be used, in conjunction with federal incentives, to write down the principal balance of mortgages. This will allow homeowners to actually refinance or sell their homes creating market turnover that is desperately needed to get the housing market going.
2. I hope that you don't need to be in foreclosure in order to get these benefits. There are lots of homeowners that are completely upside-down on their mortgage, but still make their payments on time. Otherwise, there is an incentive NOT to pay your mortgage in order to get these benefits!
Ohio will receive $335 million in benefits as part of a landmark $25 billion settlement with the nation’s five biggest mortgage companies announced today.
The settlement will be used to help keep struggling Ohioans in their homes, to demolish thousands of blighted properties, and to compensate some of those who lost their homes to foreclosure.
“Although this settlement is of historic proportion, we know it does not solve the mortgage crisis,” said Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine in announcing the settlement. “It is a start. It is a first step.”
The deal is the biggest settlement involving a single industry since a 1998 multistate tobacco deal.
Under the agreement, five lenders — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — will reduce loans for nearly 1 million households. They will also send checks to about 750,000 Americans who were improperly foreclosed upon. The banks will have three years to fulfill the terms of the deal.
Ohio’s share of the settlement will be divided approximately this way:
--$102 million will come in the form of loan modifications to homeowners who are delinquent or in the foreclosure process, possibly allowing them to remain in their home or sell the home in a short-sale.
-- $90 million will benefit homeowners who are "under water" on their mortgages, that is, owe more on their home than the property is worth.
-- $44 million will compensate former homeowners who were foreclosed upon between Jan. 1, 2008, and Jan. 31, 2011. The amount of payment will depend on the numbers who apply, but is expected to be about $2,000 per home.
-- $97 million will come as a direct payment to the state, most of which the attorney general’s office will use to demolish abandoned properties around the state.
“The time has come to shout, ‘Tear down these houses, tear down these buildings,” DeWine said.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Pennsylvania moves to tax natural-gas drilling
This is probably long overdue and Gov. Kasich has said that a tax on these drilling companies is coming to Ohio as well. Makes sense to keep up with wear on an already damaged infrastructure, if that is where the money goes. Hopefully, it doesn't squelch the industry's move into Ohio and Pennsylvania. Oh yea, the natural gas prices have already done that!!
Pennsylvania moves to tax natural-gas drilling
Pennsylvania moves to tax natural-gas drilling
Thursday, January 26, 2012
35% of ’11 residential sales were ‘distressed’
Not much of a surprise here in Central Ohio. The strong communities aren't as affected by this. It is more of a statistic in areas where middle class and lower class folks live - the one's that have been most affected by the economic recession.
35% of ’11 residential sales were ‘distressed’
35% of ’11 residential sales were ‘distressed’
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Foreclosure rates plunge in 2011 - Jan. 12, 2012
Don't get too excited by the following article. I believe that there is still a tremendous backlog of loans in default in Ohio that the lenders have just not proceeded forward. There is the robo-signing issue, Courts requiring pre-foreclosure certifications of documents, more loan modifications and other attempts at diverting foreclosure and other factors slowing the process. Gradually this year and the next, the banks will have exhausted all loss mitigation efforts and have to proceed with foreclosing on the backlog of default mortgages in Ohio.
Foreclosure rates plunge in 2011 - Jan. 12, 2012
Foreclosure rates plunge in 2011 - Jan. 12, 2012
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Foreigners bid up shale-drilling rights
Woo Hoo! Let the bubble ride begin. Can't blame landowners from cashing in, but this could be the beginning of making a mess of this opportunity. Stay tuned!
Foreigners bid up shale-drilling rights
Foreigners bid up shale-drilling rights
Monday, January 9, 2012
Oil, gas lease filing more than quadruples in 2011

This is an area of law that I am excited about getting involved with. I have found work in clearing title issues related to oil and gas leases, quiet title actions, lease review, title research, and am looking to assist landowners and oil companies in achieving their goals in this exciting wave entering Ohio.
Oil, gas lease filing more than quadruples in 2011
My advice to all involved - don't rush into any deals without consulting a real estate and/or oil and gas attorney familiar with the issues that can complicate these deals if they are not addressed at the outset. Feel free to contact me if I can be of any service.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Vacant houses swamping city
Vacant houses swamping city
This is the type of problem facing many cities in the Midwest and beyond. Columbus has actually fared better than most in the real estate collapse. However, this problem, although maybe not to this extreme, is moving into the suburbs and other developments where foreclosures are prevalent. Vandalized homes can't be sold by the banks and are eventually left to continue to fall into disrepair until no one wants them and no one will pay to demolish them. Sad state of affairs.
This is the type of problem facing many cities in the Midwest and beyond. Columbus has actually fared better than most in the real estate collapse. However, this problem, although maybe not to this extreme, is moving into the suburbs and other developments where foreclosures are prevalent. Vandalized homes can't be sold by the banks and are eventually left to continue to fall into disrepair until no one wants them and no one will pay to demolish them. Sad state of affairs.
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Home prices down for 6th straight month
Home prices down for 6th straight month
New Year's Resolution is to revive this blog with a business/current event bent, but I will try to mix business with pleasure when possible. Unfortunately these types of articles cannot be ignored due to my legal practice area. Expect more articles with this same headline over the next couple of YEARS!! Anyone who predicts a quick recovery of the housing market is kidding themselves.
Forecast for homeowners struggling to pay their mortgages or sell their homes is MORE PAIN in 2012.
New Year's Resolution is to revive this blog with a business/current event bent, but I will try to mix business with pleasure when possible. Unfortunately these types of articles cannot be ignored due to my legal practice area. Expect more articles with this same headline over the next couple of YEARS!! Anyone who predicts a quick recovery of the housing market is kidding themselves.
Forecast for homeowners struggling to pay their mortgages or sell their homes is MORE PAIN in 2012.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
9/11 Parent Essay - My Son Cole's Assignment
September 11, 2011
Hilliard
Memorial
RE: 9/11
Assignment
Cole
Linville - 8th Grade Hilliard Memorial M.S.
To
Whom it May Concern:
I
am told this essay is supposed to be about how America has changed
since 9/11. The short answer is that it certainly has changed.
The changes are sometimes hard to see and sometimes, obvious.
The
best way to describe the changes, in my opinion, is that prior to
9/11, the United States mainland had not been physically attacked by
an outside enemy since the 1800's. WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam,
Lebanon, Kuwait, Iraq...these are all areas where US citizens have
been killed, but they all occurred far away. The 9/11 attacks
happened in our homeland, in New York, Washington DC and
Pennsylvania. This is why 9/11 changed America so profoundly.
One
example of this change is the way we travel. TSA agents “patting
down” passengers, taking off your shoes in a airport, not being
allowed to wait at a gate unless you are a passenger, and bringing
only 4 ounces of liquid on plane are all habits that didn't exist
prior to 9/11.
Our
laws have changed dramatically, as well, affecting civil liberties
that are guaranteed to us by the Constitution. Police agencies have
much broader authority to stop and question and search civilians.
Many political prisoners no longer have a right to a speedy trial,
right to have charges read to them, rights to an attorney. Some
prisoners have been tortured during government sanctioned
interrogations. These are mostly unintended consequences, but many
come directly from choices our government has made in the aftermath
of 9/11.
Lastly,
war is seemingly a constant since 9/11. Prior to 9/11 there was
rarely a war in my lifetime, now there are long wars on multiple
fronts.. The War on Terror has taken a turn, in my opinion, from a
mission to stop terrorist organizations, to a political no-win gambit
to enforce American ideas and practices on foreign cultures.
However, recent events akin to the tearing down of the Berlin Wall in
Egypt, Libya, Syria and other middle eastern countries show that
their world is changing and the people of those countries are ready
for a change. Perhaps they are motivated in some ways by changing
world attitudes since 9/11.
One
thing that hasn't changed is the American spirit. While we were
shocked by the events of 9/11, we have eventually rebuilt. A
newsman stated that America is a nation of builders, not destroyers.
I believe that. Another stated, Americans do not live in fear,
Americans live in freedom. That's a good message on which to end.
Sincerely,
J.
Bradford Linville
Monday, August 22, 2011
Number of troubled mortgages on rise again
According to this article from CNN Money, its bad news for housing again. The number of delinquent mortgages tipped up slightly which was a reversal of an almost two year trend of percentage of delinquent mortgages improving slightly. While we are talking about 0.12 percentage points, this is bad news.
I believe that the mortgage percentage are an excellent indicator on how the economy is affecting the middle class. It is the middle class that has a bulk of the mortgages and it is also the middle class that bears the brunt of this bad economy. It is not at all uncommon in my experience to be working with people that are trying to pay their mortgages each month and any setback means a missed payment. The amount of taxes these people pay is a secondary concern for those just trying to pay their monthly bills. I think most of these folks, assume that they are paying the same taxes as the rich and would be shocked to see the disparity in tax rates. This can especially be true for middle class business owners that are beset by business related taxes and expenses on top of their personal obligations.
If our politicians cannot come together and make the middle class the object of US economic policy, then I think it is akin to Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burned. I am primarily speaking to Republicans, who, while trying to be heard and make policy, continue to lead the way in stonewalling, filibustering and flat out stopping any attempts to compromise over any issues. Most of this is done by kowtowing to the far right tea-partiers instead of forcing them to come towards the middle.
Meanwhile on the Republican campaign trail, its all about teaching creationism in public schools, crazy eyes, gay marriage and "birthers"....really vital issues to most of the middle class..... we're all doomed!!!!!
I believe that the mortgage percentage are an excellent indicator on how the economy is affecting the middle class. It is the middle class that has a bulk of the mortgages and it is also the middle class that bears the brunt of this bad economy. It is not at all uncommon in my experience to be working with people that are trying to pay their mortgages each month and any setback means a missed payment. The amount of taxes these people pay is a secondary concern for those just trying to pay their monthly bills. I think most of these folks, assume that they are paying the same taxes as the rich and would be shocked to see the disparity in tax rates. This can especially be true for middle class business owners that are beset by business related taxes and expenses on top of their personal obligations.
If our politicians cannot come together and make the middle class the object of US economic policy, then I think it is akin to Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burned. I am primarily speaking to Republicans, who, while trying to be heard and make policy, continue to lead the way in stonewalling, filibustering and flat out stopping any attempts to compromise over any issues. Most of this is done by kowtowing to the far right tea-partiers instead of forcing them to come towards the middle.
Meanwhile on the Republican campaign trail, its all about teaching creationism in public schools, crazy eyes, gay marriage and "birthers"....really vital issues to most of the middle class..... we're all doomed!!!!!
Monday, August 15, 2011
Why I Love Warren Buffett and why Republicans will probably say he's wrong!
This is a reprint of an article by Warren Buffett that appeared in the New York Times recently. I think it is a pretty good comeback post for my blog considering what I have been ruminating about privately. I only wish anyone in Congress would listen to Warren Buffett rather than some T-Bagging right wing idiot! But they probably won't, so for the rest of us, please read this extraordinary opinion piece of common sense:
OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched. While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors. These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It’s nice to have friends in high places.
Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent. If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.
To understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes. It’s a different story for the middle class: typically, they fall into the 15 percent and 25 percent income tax brackets, and then are hit with heavy payroll taxes to boot. Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends. I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off.
And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation. Since 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion — a staggering $227.4 million on average — but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent. The taxes I refer to here include only federal income tax, but you can be sure that any payroll tax for the 400 was inconsequential compared to income. In fact, 88 of the 400 in 2008 reported no wages at all, though every one of them reported capital gains. Some of my brethren may shun work but they all like to invest. (I can relate to that.)
I know well many of the mega-rich and, by and large, they are very decent people. They love America and appreciate the opportunity this country has given them. Many have joined the Giving Pledge, promising to give most of their wealth to philanthropy. Most wouldn’t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.
Twelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country’s finances. They’ve been instructed to devise a plan that reduces the 10-year deficit by at least $1.5 trillion. It’s vital, however, that they achieve far more than that. Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country’s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness. That feeling can create its own reality.
Job one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can’t fulfill. Big money must be saved here. The 12 should then turn to the issue of revenues. I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.
But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.
My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.
OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched. While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors. These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It’s nice to have friends in high places.
Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent. If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.
To understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes. It’s a different story for the middle class: typically, they fall into the 15 percent and 25 percent income tax brackets, and then are hit with heavy payroll taxes to boot. Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends. I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off.
And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation. Since 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion — a staggering $227.4 million on average — but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent. The taxes I refer to here include only federal income tax, but you can be sure that any payroll tax for the 400 was inconsequential compared to income. In fact, 88 of the 400 in 2008 reported no wages at all, though every one of them reported capital gains. Some of my brethren may shun work but they all like to invest. (I can relate to that.)
I know well many of the mega-rich and, by and large, they are very decent people. They love America and appreciate the opportunity this country has given them. Many have joined the Giving Pledge, promising to give most of their wealth to philanthropy. Most wouldn’t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.
Twelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country’s finances. They’ve been instructed to devise a plan that reduces the 10-year deficit by at least $1.5 trillion. It’s vital, however, that they achieve far more than that. Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country’s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness. That feeling can create its own reality.
Job one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can’t fulfill. Big money must be saved here. The 12 should then turn to the issue of revenues. I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.
But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.
My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)